ClickCease
Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
Back to Glossary

Public Market Equivalent (PME)

What is the Public Market Equivalent (PME)?

Public market equivalent (PME) is a methodology for assessing the performance of a private equity fund relative to a public equity benchmark. PME is one method to determine whether a private equity fund or manager is providing performance alpha.  

Several types of PMEs have been developed for this purpose. The initial PME methodology was developed by Austin M. Long and Craig J. Nickels in 1996. The authors call it the Index Comparison Method (ICM), though it is also known as the Long Nickels PME, LN-PME, or simply PME.

The LN-PME compares the performance of a private equity fund with the S&P 500 Index by creating a theoretical investment in the index using the cash flows from the private equity fund and then determining the IRR of the theoretical investment. That means capital calls are assumed to buy the index and distributions are assumed to sell the index. The return of the fund can then be compared to the return of the hypothetical investment to determine whether there is positive or negative alpha.

Other variations of the PME include the PME+, Modified PME, Kaplan Schoar (KS-PME), Direct Alpha and Excess IRR.

 Key takeaways

  • PME is a way to compare the performance of a private equity fund to a public equity benchmark
  • There are multiple ways to calculate PME, though the basic premise is similar
  • PME calculations are theoretical and have limitations

PME in private equity: why is it important?

Several problems are incurred when assessing the performance of private equity funds:

  • An internal rate of return (IRR) calculation assumes that money awaiting investment and distributions from the investment are reinvested at the same rate as the fund itself, which is normally unrealistic for a PE fund.
  • Private equity fund investments are characterised by staggered cash flows both into and out of the fund, making direct performance comparisons with public equity funds problematic.
  • Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC) calculations do not consider the time value of money.

PME methodologies attempt to solve some of these issues by measuring the hypothetical return that would result from deploying a private equity fund's cash flows into a benchmark equity market index.

PME offers another way to assess the performance of a private equity fund and compare it to the performance of a well-known benchmark.

PME formula and calculation

The PME is an IRR on the cash flows of the investment, using as final cashflow an adjusted PME NAV. The formula for PME is:

The formula for PME

Where:

C is the cash flow from the investment at date s (positive for a contribution, negative for a distribution)

NAV is the value of the index at date s

PME = IRR(Cs, NAVPME)

Master private equity in 6 lessons

Enroll in Moonfare’s free Private Equity Starter Course. In six emails, you’ll learn the essentials of the asset class and how it could transform your portfolio.

Subscribe
Webinar

Master private equity in 6 lessons

Enroll in Moonfare’s free Private Equity Starter Course. In six emails, you’ll learn the essentials of the asset class and how it could transform your portfolio.

Subscribe
White paper

Master private equity in 6 lessons

Enroll in Moonfare’s free Private Equity Starter Course. In six emails, you’ll learn the essentials of the asset class and how it could transform your portfolio.

Subscribe

Master private equity in 6 lessons

Enroll in Moonfare’s free Private Equity Starter Course. In six emails, you’ll learn the essentials of the asset class and how it could transform your portfolio.

Subscribe

Limitations of PME

PME is a theoretical construct. Therefore, its resulting IRR can, at best, serve as an approximation. The biggest issue with regard to PME calculations is the relevance of the index as an appropriate benchmark for the PE fund. The technique does not make an adjustment for the difference in risk between the PE fund and the public equity index. Therefore, a higher IRR for the theoretical investment may be reflecting a higher risk rather than the alpha of the PE fund manager.

Additionally, a Long Nickel PME can produce negative values for the theoretical investment if large distributions occur from the PE fund at a time when the benchmark index is falling. This can preclude the ability to calculate an appropriate IRR from the theoretical investment.

Other PME methodologies

The table below compares the top four methodologies for determining PME.

Methodology Description Strengths Weaknesses
LN-PME First PME to be developed (1996). Compares the performance of a private equity fund with the S&P 500 Index by creating a theoretical investment in the index using the cash flows from the private equity fund and then determining the IRR of the theoretical investment. Simple and widely recognized as the original PME methodology. Can produce negative values for the theoretical investment if large distributions occur from the PE fund at a time when the benchmark index is falling and may not produce an IRR.
PME+ Same basic approach as LN-PME but instead of modifying the NAV of the investment, the PME+ discounts the distributions by a factor designed to make the NAV of the index investment match the NAV of the fund. Resolves LN-PME problem of potentially negative values for the theoretical investment. May still face criticisms for the complexity of the distribution discounting process and potential lack of intuitive understanding.
mPME Rather than subtracting the distributed amounts from the public investment, the modified PME (mPME) computes the weight of the distribution in the private investment and removes the same weight from the public one. Provides an alternate way to address the negative NAV limitation of the LN-PME. May introduce additional complexity in computation and is less commonly used than other PME methods.
KS-PME Kaplan Schoar PME (KS-PME) returns a market multiple rather than an IRR. Avoids the IRR issues in favour of a multiple-on-investment approach. Does not consider the time value of investments or distributions, which can impact the accuracy of comparisons.

Since public equity indexes are familiar benchmarks to investors and they may want to compare public vs. private equity investment opportunities, a PME methodology can be used to assess the returns from private equity funds to a public equity index. While PME is a theoretical approach, it can provide a perspective on the differences in performance of various types of PE funds and managers vis a vis a public equity index and help to determine whether a private equity manager has been providing alpha as well.

Interested in Moonfare's investments?

Discover our selection of exclusive funds from some of the world’s most reputable private equity managers.

Sign up to view funds
Webinar

Interested in Moonfare's investments?

Discover our selection of exclusive funds from some of the world’s most reputable private equity managers.

Sign up to view funds
White paper

Interested in Moonfare's investments?

Discover our selection of exclusive funds from some of the world’s most reputable private equity managers.

Sign up to view funds

Interested in Moonfare's investments?

Discover our selection of exclusive funds from some of the world’s most reputable private equity managers.

Sign up to view funds

Webinar

White paper

Important notice: This content is for informational purposes only. Moonfare does not provide investment advice. You should not construe any information or other material provided as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. If you are unsure about anything, you should seek financial advice from an authorised advisor. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. Private equity is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Subject to eligibility. Please see https://www.moonfare.com/disclaimers.

CONTENT INDEX

Was this article helpful?

Thank you for your answer

{ "@type": "Person", "name": "Blazej Kupec", "description": "Blazej is a senior content manager at Moonfare. With ten years of experience in financial media, he now covers trends and developments in private equity. Blazej especially enjoys creating content that helps people better understand the intricacies of the asset class. He holds a BSc in Political Science from the University of Ljubljana.", "jobTitle": "Senior Content Manager", "sameAs": [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/blazej-kupec/" ], "knowsAbout": [ "Private Equity", "Venture Capital", "Investing", "Journalism" ], "alumniOf": [ { "@type": "CollegeOrUniversity", "Name": "University of Ljubljana", "sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Ljubljana" } ] }